View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Rocco Augusto
Contributing Editor
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1093
Location: Portland, OR
|
Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2006 1:41 pm Post subject: Verizon Wireless branded Pantech PN-820 Pictures Leaked |
|
|
http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2006/...ictures-leaked/
"It looks like our favorite mobile tipster Roc A Fella is at it again. This time he shows us the soon to be released Pantech PN-820 for Verizon Wireless, latest addition to their growing PDA lineup. This clamshell bad boy runs on Windows Mobile 5.0 Smartphone with an EV-DO dual band radio, 1.3 megapixel camera, expandable memory via miniSD, Bluetooth, and a QVGA display. Pantech has updated the color scheme from what we previously have seen, and we like it way more seeing how the all-black scheme might be a fingerprint magnet. Look for the device as an exclusive on the web and B2B on 12/18 and in retail on 12/29."
While it is not the nicest looking Smartphone on the planet, it does have some pretty decent specs. I'm curious though, who would buy this when they could buy the Motorola Q?
_________________
Smartphone Thoughts
Contributing Editor
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
HalM
Smartphone Ponderer
Joined: 28 Oct 2004
Posts: 100
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Janak Parekh
Rogue Pocket PC Thoughts Editor
Joined: 30 Jun 2003
Posts: 306
Location: New York, NY
|
Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2006 3:06 pm Post subject: Re: Verizon Wireless branded Pantech PN-820 Pictures Leaked |
|
|
Rocco Augusto wrote: |
I'm curious though, who would buy this when they could buy the Motorola Q? |
Is this a serious question? There are plenty of people out there who wouldn't mind a cell phone with sync and software install capability, and who don't want a thumbboard or the larger size.
--janak
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jerry Raia
Contributing Editor
Joined: 07 Jul 2003
Posts: 4528
Location: Los Angeles
|
Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2006 4:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
OK it isn't gorgeous, but it is nice to see more clamshell Smartphones.
_________________
[3125] [BlackJack] [8525]
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
byteme
Smartphone Theorist
Joined: 16 Nov 2003
Posts: 257
|
Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2006 5:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Better looking than the Star Trek but that wouldn't take much.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jerry Raia
Contributing Editor
Joined: 07 Jul 2003
Posts: 4528
Location: Los Angeles
|
Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2006 5:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
byteme wrote: |
Better looking than the Star Trek but that wouldn't take much. |
NO WAY!
_________________
[3125] [BlackJack] [8525]
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
byteme
Smartphone Theorist
Joined: 16 Nov 2003
Posts: 257
|
Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2006 5:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jerry Raia wrote: |
byteme wrote: |
Better looking than the Star Trek but that wouldn't take much. |
NO WAY!
|
YES WAY!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jerry Raia
Contributing Editor
Joined: 07 Jul 2003
Posts: 4528
Location: Los Angeles
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
byteme
Smartphone Theorist
Joined: 16 Nov 2003
Posts: 257
|
Posted: Wed Nov 22, 2006 6:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rocco Augusto
Contributing Editor
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1093
Location: Portland, OR
|
Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 12:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
please, stop the violence!
the phone isn't that bad looking, its cute in a 2002/2003 vintage kinda way
_________________
Smartphone Thoughts
Contributing Editor
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|