View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Rocco Augusto
Contributing Editor
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1216
Location: Portland, OR
|
Posted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 11:04 pm Post subject: AT&T To Replace Cingular Brand Monday |
|
|
http://www.computerworld.com/action...rc=news_ts_head
"AT&T Wireless was once an independent company that had been spun off from AT&T Corp. Cingular Wireless LLC bought the wireless operator and eliminated the AT&T Wireless brand. Then SBC, one of the owners of Cingular, bought AT&T, adopting the AT&T brand for its landline services. More recently, AT&T bought BellSouth Corp., the other owner of Cingular, spurring the switch back to the AT&T brand for the wireless service. Now that AT&T is the parent company of several telecommunications brands, it is consolidating the branding under the AT&T name as a way of cutting costs. AT&T estimates that 20% of the operating expenses it expects to save through the merger with BellSouth will come from consolidating advertising."
I wasn't too attached to the Cingular name so I will not be heartbroken to see it fade away. The good news is, since all of the AT&T Wireless customers were finally migrated to the Cingular billing system, there should be no interruptions in service. As much as I love Cingular's service, I don't think I could go through that much torture again.
Source: peterawest
_________________
Help make a difference and you could win - Find out how over here
Smartphone Thoughts
Contributing Editor
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kris Kumar
Contributing Editor
Joined: 02 Jul 2003
Posts: 4440
Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 5:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
I wish they had kept the Cingular name.
I think Cingular had put in a lot of effort into establishing a brand name. Plus the effort involved and the money needed to change store signs, brochures, advertisements, labels on the phones and invoices etc is huge, its enormous.
I think the money paid by the subscribers is well spent on enhancing the network, I mean deploying HSDPA/3G network. I am sure this name change is going to affect the subscribers regardless of what AT&T says. I don't think either name has a better goodwill than the other.
_________________
"The greatest gift of all" - click here
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
MitchellO
Smartphone Ponderer
Joined: 15 Jan 2006
Posts: 91
Location: Leonay, Australia
|
Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 8:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
I have to say that I think that the name Cingular is a lot nicer than AT&T :p
_________________
Palm Treo 750v | Dell Inspiron 710m | XP Media Centre PC
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
dstrauss
Smartphone Pupil
Joined: 06 Dec 2005
Posts: 50
Location: Texas
|
Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 8:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Personally, the name doesn't make any difference to me, but to a lot of folks, they "know" AT&T but still wonder what "Cingular" is. It's kind of like Coke vs. RC Cola.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jerry Raia
Contributing Editor
Joined: 07 Jul 2003
Posts: 4842
Location: Los Angeles
|
Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 8:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
I prefer the Cingular name and wish they would just put tthe ATT moniker to sleep forever. I also like the Cingular logo better too.
_________________
[BlackJack] [8525]
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jason Dunn
Executive Editor
Joined: 30 Jun 2003
Posts: 1498
Location: Calgary, CANADA
|
Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 11:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Cingular: new, hip, cool
AT&T: old, busted, '70s
The people making this decision do NOT understand branding. AT&T might resonate with grandma, but are there more grandmas buying phones than younger people? Probably not. Cingular built up a lot of brand recognition over the past few years, and A&T just screams "old school legacy".
Bad, bad decision that no doubt has T-Mobile giggling with glee.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
macattack
Smartphone Pupil
Joined: 29 Mar 2006
Posts: 11
Location: The Deep South
|
Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 11:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jason Dunn wrote: |
The people making this decision do NOT understand branding... Cingular built up a lot of brand recognition over the past few years, and A&T just screams "old school legacy".
Bad, bad decision that no doubt has T-Mobile giggling with glee. |
Here, Here! I couldn't agree more!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jerry Raia
Contributing Editor
Joined: 07 Jul 2003
Posts: 4842
Location: Los Angeles
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
dougben50
Smartphone Neophyte
Joined: 16 Jan 2007
Posts: 1
|
Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 12:54 pm Post subject: AT&T |
|
|
I remember when I had service through Voice Stream in 2001. They were made to give up some of their area in Texas and I got AT&T as my new service. They promised that no major changes would happen, but then everyone on Voice Stream was required to go the one of the AT&T local outlets and turn in our phones for one of theirs. This would not have been a bad thing, but I had a phone that was a cut above what they were giving out. I was informed that if I wanted a different model, I would have to pay for it, which I did. The service was so bad, I closed my account within 2 months.
Saying all of this, I hope that they are smart enough to use Cingular's backbone and not make everyone turn in phones this time.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jerry Raia
Contributing Editor
Joined: 07 Jul 2003
Posts: 4842
Location: Los Angeles
|
Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 1:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No I think this is just a name change because they have some twisted fetish over the AT&T brand. Still to me that brand represents dinosaurs and failure.
_________________
[BlackJack] [8525]
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|